Indian law student Veeransh Bhanushali delivered a sharp and forceful speech at the prestigious Oxford Union, strongly challenging Pakistan’s position on terrorism. His remarks during the India–Pakistan debate quickly gained international attention and sparked widespread discussion.
Controversy Around the Debate
The debate itself triggered controversy even before it began. Oxford Union president Musa Harraj, son of Pakistan’s Defence Minister, allegedly tried to block Indian participation. He reportedly denied invitations to Indian delegates and claimed that India had withdrawn. Despite this, Veeransh directly confronted the Pakistani side during the student-level debate.
Emotional Reference to 26/11 Attacks
The discussion took place on November 26, the anniversary of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. Veeransh recalled that he was a child at the time and had witnessed the aftermath at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, located close to his home. He said India’s actions against terrorism reflect responsibility, not political populism.
“No Slogans Needed, Just a Calendar”
Veeransh argued that slogans are not required to counter Pakistan. He said “just one calendar” proves his point, noting that terror attacks like the 1993 Mumbai blasts happened without any elections. He added that India’s patience after 26/11 only led to further attacks, including Pathankot, Uri and Pulwama.
Strong Words on Pakistan’s Internal Crisis
He rejected claims that recent military actions aimed at elections. Instead, he said India acted to punish terrorists who killed innocent civilians. Veeransh also criticised Pakistan’s leadership, accusing it of hiding poverty and governance failures by promoting fear of war.
Call for Peace, With Firm Conditions
Concluding his speech, Veeransh said India wants peaceful relations and trade with its neighbours. However, he warned that India will stay prepared as long as terrorism remains Pakistan’s foreign policy tool. Despite attempts to disrupt the discussion, the Indian student presented facts and exposed contradictions on a global platform.
